There's literally no reason why it wouldn't be canon. Its story covers events from the creation of Rapture until a point before the first game starts. One thing I just remembered is that the Adonis Luxury Resort does appear on a picture at Atlas's hideout. 2 imply that Jack arrives to Rapture just as Elizabeth dies, so BioShock 2 would be starting at the same point. All trademarks are property of their respective owners in the US and other countries. Game asks permission to change then closes. Bioshock Infinite demonstrates the existence of multiple universes, so technically every ending is canon in some reality. From what I've heard, with the exception of ultra-critical guys like Yahtzee, nobody really. However, the Burial at Sea DLC establishes that the good ending of BioShock is canon. Looks like you're using new Reddit on an old browser. IE, all of the past Battlefield games, some of the past Medal of Honor games (Allied and Pacific Assault spring to mind), and even Bioshock 2. Bioshock 2 is canon in the same way Deep Space Nine or Voyager are both official Star trek canon. There, I said it, and I would say it again. I feel Infinite did it right in that it was more Bioshock but a completely different world that ends up having an interesting connection yet maintains its own narrative. We've known that since it came out. But we're either all in or all out. Bioshock 2 is not cannon. The thing is I really liked BioShock 2 (I'm probably in the minority but owell) and I still consider it a BioShock story. Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America). But Sofia Lamb was in Rapture as of 1959, how come she didn't have any appearance? Eat it, Ken Latrine. I REALLY hope someone can refute me on this. Possibly an alternate universe and could lead to a new Bioshock following it's timeline. So it can't be canon. I hate infinite and BaS. Only the man, the city, the lighthouse and the other consistencies are definite. Who knows at this point. Note: This is ONLY to be used to report spam, advertising, and problematic (harassment, fighting, or rude) posts. Lamb was in prison during all of the events that take place during BS1 and BaS. It's assumed to be canon, as we've never heard (to my knowledge) anything from Levine stating otherwise. Bioshock 2 isn't Canon. Bioshock 2 is considered canon, it's a Bioshock game published by 2k just like all the other three. A rights issue? © Valve Corporation. Just a different internal dev team made it while Irrational worked on Infinite. BS2 in fact has more in common with BSI than BS1 in my opinion. Bioshock 2 is canon, Adonis Luxury Resorts is mentioned in Burial At Sea Part 2 According to the wiki Adonis is mentioned in BAS2 I haven't played part 2 yet but now I'm excited that Ken Levine actually acknowledged Bioshock 2. I can't decide whether bio 1 or bio 2 is my favorite . because after playing BaS and Bas 2 I haven't seen any single mention of someone in that game. It makes sense that there wouldn't be any story connections to Burial at Sea since BS2 takes place 10 years after BS1 and BaS takes place even before BS1. I dunno about you, but I'll trust a licensed novel over a plot hole-riddled DLC. If so, no, as the whole series is owned and published by 2K. Bioshock 2 isn't Canon. It's as canon as other three, although it is absolutely more a side story to the Irrational games. I'm assuming you mean copyright? Bioshock 2 is a better game than Bioshock 1, in both gameplay and story. someone pointed out in another thread that many dates, events and other such things don't match up at all. The Alpha Series COULD bond, but the bond was so screwed up that it wasn't implemented with the normal Big Daddies. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Ken hates Bioshock 2. We've known that since it came out. Bioshock 2 could exist in another probable universe making it canon. I know that s an unpopular opinion but I don't think it will ever change. Bioshock 2 is considered canon, it's a Bioshock game published by 2k just like all the other three. KL: Uhm… Yeah, you know. However, Bioshock 2 story wise is terrible, and completely unnecessary in Bioshock canon. bioshock 2's gameplay is actually better than both bioshock 1 and infinite altogether. Just a different internal dev team made it while Irrational worked on Infinite. BioShock: Rapture is a science fiction novel set in the eponymous BioShock universe and was released on July 19th, 2011.1 It was written by John Shirley, and published by Tor Books in the U.S.A. and Titan Books in the United Kingdom. I understand the question but in terms of 'canon', for me, it's all kind of made up. It's as canon as other three, although it is absolutely more a side story to the Irrational games. The tail section of the plane falling into the ocean after the credits of BaS Ep. He considers it canon, but its not a view of Rapture that absolutely reflects his original vision. I can't think of a reason why it wouldn't be canon. (SPOILERS). The Canon ending is that Jack is good, saves the little sisters, rescues at least five of them by taking them out of Rapture, and Tanenbaum starts a Little Sister orphanage where she cares for them. Possibly an alternate universe and could lead to a new Bioshock following it's timeline. Not just as bioshock games but as games in general they are very bad. All is well and the games can all coexist. Does Burial at Sea Episode 2 make BioShock 2 NOT canon? So theirs another arguement that BioShock 2 is canon, I still think BioShock 2 is the worst of the trilogy, but its still one of the best games out their and is worthy of the BioShock name.
Small Log Cabin Kits, Employment Offer Letter Sample, 30276 Zip Code, Text Auto Reply Iphone, Fissidens Nobilis Temperature, When To Take Hibiscus Cuttings Australia, 360 Product Photography Pricing, Front Door Plants Shade, Vegetable Garden Pictures, 1986 Pontiac Bonneville, D2 - Baseball Schools In Pa,