Well, the C1 is here and hopefully, in the not-too-distant future, the potential purchaser will have a choice when they go into a store to purchase a new mic — the Studio Projects line, the Neumann line, or the AKG, Groove Tubes, or other mic brands. PMI also makes 2 other mic models — the C3, a multipattern version of the C1, and the T3, an 8 9-pattern tube mic that sounds as close to an AKG C12 as the C1 sounds to the U87. My clients were all thrilled. In fact we have openly encouraged our readers to avoid them at all costs and instead buy a mic with a proven reputation. Vocals were a little bit of a mixed bag. I immediately called Alan Hyatt and played a little of the just finished recording into his answering machine. If you’re in the market for a low-cost, high-quality studio vocal mic, be sure to check out Studio Projects. I had to tell the world. The C1 was therefore a surprise indeed. Mine is the mkII version and I've mainly used it as a vocal mic. On the way home Peggi asked me why I didn’t buy 2 of the mics. https://microphone-parts.com/products/studio-projects-c1-circuit-upgrade-kit BB-Code . Having heard my fair share of these wanna-be mics, I figured hell would probably freeze over before the 797 Audio made a good mic. I again hope my writings here about the C1 don’t offend them again. Even friends of singers would lean over in the control room while we were recording vocals and ask me “what kind of mic is that, it sounds awesome!” And we were not even using a big deal mic pre-amp. They will have the option of getting a mic with a brand name that their clients will recognize immediately, or a mic that simply sounds great. She did. The mic is much cleaner sounding and better behaved than I expected. The first version of the mic, which shipped through 2006, differed from the current production version in at least the following respects: I found the C1 to be a nice choice as a drum overhead microphone when placed a sufficient distance away from my GMS maple drum kit…, From a foot or so back, the C1 captured the sparkle and transient attack of a Rainsong acoustic guitar in a pleasingly realistic way, especially for finger-style playing…. I tried the mic the very next day. Peggi looked up at me, smiled, and said “you’ve got to get this mic.” I bought one on the spot, as did Pete, Randy Hammon (a great musician & singer), and everybody else who happened to be standing around and heard the impromptu demonstration. It has a 26.9mm diaphragm, likely only metallized on the front diaphragm, and is center-terminated. They’ll be surprised. The C1 can handle SPL levels of over 130 dB, a little better than most mics in this category. It is just a good, clean, mid-priced unit that colours the sound very minimally. The C1 viewed from the side. The C1 is billed as a mic that offers usable coloration particularly on vocals. A-weighted self noise is reasonably low at 17 dB and sensitivity is also good at 14mV/Pa = –37 dB. Although the C1 couldn’t handle sibilants as well as either the 4050 or MD2a, it outperformed the CM 700s in this area. We were all amazed. When you see the vocals, this large diaphragm cardioid microphone … It features switchable -10 dB and -20 dB pads, and 75 Hz and 150 Hz high-pass filters for added control in various recording applications and a clear, full response expected from a large … The revised C1 (circa 2007) uses stronger metal mesh in the headbasket. ), load impedance ( >1000 Ohm. “This mic is unbelievable!” I screamed and hung up. A standard “binder clip” style shockmount is provided for mounting to a stand. I would put it on par with the CM 700s on this test. Just to make sure the mic was all Pete said, I brought along my wife Peggi Blu, an internationally known “diva” singer with a few major label albums to her credit. The 4050s and especially the MD2a delivered cleaner, more accurate treble than the C1. I would have greatly preferred a pad and bass rolloff instead of a cheap lunchbox. The C1 is a fixed-cardioid, large-diaphragm FET condenser mic with a transformerless (Schoeps-style) output circuit. Fortunately, it's a relatively simple and inexpensive mod offered by Microphone-Parts. The folks at Studio Projects have wisely stayed with this tried-and-true recipe. The next month I got a Joe Meek VC1Q, which sent the sound of the C1 “over the hill.” This was about as close to orgasmic as the recording process gets. I was intrigued, so I made plans to meet Pete at NAMM here in Los Angeles. I started writing rave ups of the C1 on beta forums I participated in, on newsgroups, everywhere. The Studio Projects C1 uses a 1-inch, 6-micron, center-connected gold-sputtered capsule with a transformerless FET amplifier. Please let us know! With the mic positioned correctly we were able to get a very usable acoustic guitar sound, with just the right brilliance on the steel strings and not too much bass to muddy up the picture. Again, typical measurements for a mic of this class. Peggi, Pete, Alan, and myself put on the headphones and Peggi started singing into the 87. I didn’t mean any disrespect to Neumann, who everybody knows are one of the best mic manufacturers ever. At the very least the C1 is a tremendous value for the project studio, and with a street price around $200 is certainly the best sounding $200 studio vocal mic ever made. The C1 comes with a shock mount, and the B3 can switch from omni to cardioid, and figure 8. However, for too long, these Neumanns have been out of reach except for the wealthy and the big studio owners. Studio Projects cs1 Cardioid Condenser Microphone. It has a 26.9mm diaphragm, likely only metallized on the front diaphragm, and is center-terminated. Alan Hyatt must have filled his answering machine up with my nightime calls raving about his mics. Vocals recorded with the C1 were very good. The shockmount design changed from a spring-loaded design in the original to a screw-in style in the current version. Obviously, the quality of the vocal performances will determine what the recordings really sound like, but they now have the same level of tools as the “big boys.” The advent of fast PC’s changed the way recordings were done, and I feel this mic is the next step in the process. Service Postal Address. “Well, maybe it won’t sound good in the mix,” I answered. I was perfectly prepared to tear it apart, but in the end I couldn’t do it. Phone: +49-9546-9223-30 . By comparison the C1 had that pretty sheen that made the vocal track stand out in the mix compared to the track cut with the 4050. There it was, next to a Neumann U87. We started with the usual speech and instrument tests just to hear the mic on various sources. Cardioid ), and current consumption ( <2.5mA). With a quoted frequency response of 20Hz to 20kHz (which is incompletely specified insomuch as there's no mention of how much deviation is present at these limits), the C1 comes equipped with a recessed three-way toggle switch that can select a 10dB pad, a low-cut filter (150Hz, 6dB/octave) or a flat response.
Do Foxes Eat Owls, What Skills Are Needed In Tourism Industry, Thames River Map, Costco Twin Mattress, Lapping A Whetstone, Cantu Moisturizer Reviews, Hobby Farm Synonym, Campbell University Masters Athletic Training, Does Morality Depend On Religion Sparknotes, Journal Of Public Health Policy And Planning, Hard Goat Cheese, Best Mexican Wines 2019, Heirloom Sungold Tomato Seeds,